Student In US Wins Injunction Against Arizona’s Transgender Athlete Ban
In a recent situation, it has been noted that the state of Arizona will not be able to implement a ban that restricts transgender girls from participating in teams consisting of women. This has been imposed as a challenge where the federal trial court has ruled.
The plaintiffs, identified as Megan Roe and Jane Doe, have been entitled to a preliminary injunction due to their likeness to prevail on their claims regarding the law that violates the “Equal Protection Clause” and “Title IX of Education Amendments of 1972.” The district judge for Arizona ruled out recently.
The plaintiffs of the case were observed to have sought declaratory relief under the Fourteenth Amendment, Title IX, the Americans With Disability Act, and the Rehabilitation Act.
The plaintiffs of this case have been noted to belong within the “quasi-protected class,” which enables the State to provide an exceedingly persuasive justification for the alleged biased treatment. This has been stated by citing a Supreme Court precedent of the United States.
On the other hand, the state of Arizona has shown that it has not banned all transgender girls from participating in women’s sports in a categorical manner. And also known for its capacity to have substantial importance to the government.
Views Of Arizona To Bar Transgender Girls Participating In Women’s Sports
The state of Arizona has argued that it had banned transgender girls from participating in women’s sports for the purpose of protecting the rights of biological girls. This is because transgender girls have a greater advantage over other girls. On the other hand, they also do not have the athletic build as compared to biological women.
However, Arizona in the year 2022 signed SB1165 into law, which allowed the student to sue their schools for the purpose of injunctive relief and damages caused to students due to the school’s actions and regulations.
Read More:
